Recently Published Halton Decisions

2 Nov 2026 10:00 AM | Anonymous

Find below recently published Halton decisions, available for free through CanLII.org.

Superior Court of Justice

R. v. Gates (2026 ONSC 5454)
On a Crown summary conviction appeal from an acquittal for assault causing bodily harm, the appeal judge found the trial judge erred by alluding to a “consensual fight” without addressing governing authorities. However, the Crown failed to show the error materially affected the acquittal, which rested on reasonable doubt tied to self-defence. The appeal was dismissed.
Justice C. Conlan

R. v. Samuel-Barriteau (2026 ONSC 5619)
In sentencing proceedings after convictions for possession for the purpose of trafficking fentanyl and methamphetamine and possession of proceeds of crime, the judge emphasized denunciation and deterrence, treating the offender as a first offender. Guided by comparable cases and aggravating quantities, the judge imposed a global sentence of 5 years and 9 months’ imprisonment, concurrent on all counts.
Justice C. Conlan

R. v. C.D. (2026 ONSC 5664)
In sentencing proceedings after guilty pleas, the judge refuses a conditional sentence for a mother convicted of criminal negligence causing bodily harm to her twin sons. Despite serious physical and mental health issues and compliance on release, denunciation and deterrence required incarceration. She receives 3.5 years’ imprisonment concurrent, with ancillary orders.
Justice C. Conlan

Meridian Credit Union Limited v. Mian (2026 ONSC 5725)
On a motion to set aside a default judgment, the court applies the Rule 19.08(1) “interests of justice” test and the Mountain View factors. Given prompt action, a plausible explanation for the default, and an arguable misrepresentation defence, it sets aside the noting in default, default judgment, and writs, and permits a defence.
Associate Justice J. Glick

S.R., K.M., S.M. v. Rotherglen School (2026 ONSC 5808)
On a motion for confidentiality-related relief in a civil action against a school, the court applied the Sherman Estate test and granted anonymization and limited sealing/redactions to protect minor plaintiffs’ privacy. It ordered redaction of current ages/grades, parents’ occupations, and event years, sealed unredacted materials, and allowed return on short notice; no costs.
Associate Justice J. Glick

George W. Corporation v. Gomma (2026 ONSC 5811)
On a motion for further documentary disclosure in a civil action involving an outstanding Mareva injunction, the court applies pleadings-based relevance and proportionality. It orders targeted production of banking and vehicle-sale records tied to 65 vehicles, a further search for Canada Drives sales records, production of a Dealer Authorization Letter, and a further affidavit of documents.
Associate Justice J. Glick

D’Silva v Ilia (2026 ONSC 5899)
On a family law motion, the applicant sought to set aside a consent equalization order under rule 25(19)(a) for alleged fraud about corporate shares and non-disclosure of a property interest. The judge found no proven fraudulent misrepresentation or inducement, and any omission was not materially foundational. The motion was dismissed.
Justice C. Chang

E.M. v. S.M. (2026 ONSC 6063)
In a family law costs endorsement following a successful motion for a certificate of pending litigation against property owned by the respondent’s mother, the judge rejects full recovery and finds no bad faith or unreasonable conduct. The court awards partial indemnity costs of $24,000, payable within 30 days, rather than reserving costs.
Justice C. Conlan

Ontario Court of Justice

R. v. Romero Garay (2026 ONCJ 633)
In an application for a stay under s. 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the judge finds net delay of 698 days after deducting 131 days of defence delay. The Crown fails to show exceptional circumstances because undisclosed police interactions with the complainant derailed the trial. Proceedings are stayed on all counts.
Justice J. Campitelli

Court of Appeal Decisions of Local Interest

R. v. Naqvi (2026 ONCA 719)
On a Crown sentence appeal, the Court holds the sentencing judge erred by minimizing the offender’s moral blameworthiness and failing to treat grooming as aggravating. It finds the 2.5-year sentence unfit for sexual interference, child luring, and possession of CSAEM, and increases the global sentence to four years’ imprisonment.
Justice E. Chozik

R. v. Papadopoulos (2026 ONCA 733)
In a criminal appeal from convictions, the Court upholds dismissal of a Garofoli application. It finds the edited Information to Obtain, read cumulatively, supported reasonable grounds to believe the accused was participating in drug trafficking and that evidence could be found in the vehicle he used. The appeal is dismissed.
Justice A. Maclure

LPP 2027 Recruitment

22 Oct 2026 9:00 AM | Anonymous

The Law Practice Program (LPP) is an innovative lawyer licensing pathway in Ontario, launched in 2014, that offers an 8-month virtual and rigorous program through both simulated virtual training (4 months), as well as a hands-on work term (4 months). The LPP was launched by the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) as a pilot program in 2014 to support lawyer licensing in the province. On Monday, August 24th, the LPP launched its 13th year with over 270 licensing candidates. Speakers during the launch included retired Chief Justice of Ontario, George Strathy and Regional Senior Judge of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario for Central West, Ria Tzimas. This new cohort brings experience from both Canadian law schools and across the globe, including those with Masters and PhD degrees, and some having practised as lawyers previously in over 20 countries and speaking over 47 different languages! The Candidates are supported in the program by experienced practising Ontario lawyers as Mentors, Subject Matter Experts, Assessors, Advisors and Employers.

This year we have 13 candidates from Oakville and Milton in the LPP. These candidates are eager to learn from members of the HCLA during their 16-week work placements. The work placements begin in the new year (January-April, with flexibility for differing start dates depending on a lawyer’s availability to host the candidate). Employers include government, major institutions, large and small firms, speciality boutiques and sole practitioners. Because all the core competencies required by the LSO are covered in the Practical Training, candidates become involved in the relevant areas of their employer’s practice (drafting, research, client management etc).

We keep the process simple: submit an Employer Profile Form (EPF): LPP 2027 Employer Profile Form (EPF) and we will post your opportunity to LPP candidates and provide you with a link to applications. The LPP is pleased to assist with vetting of the applications per each firm or practitioner’s specifications and will prepare a short-list of applicants. Please feel welcome to let the LPP know any skills and languages that are preferred.

The LPP work experience is a great option for recruiting, gaining CPD hours (12 hours) and giving back to the profession. It also provides you with a candidate that is trained and productive and, in turn, allows the candidate to become licensed.

LPP Supervising lawyers can apply to the LSO for recognition of 12 CPD hours for the year. This is done as Alternate Educational Activities. To qualify for accreditation of Professionalism hours (3), alternate educational activities must address topics of professional responsibility, ethics, practice management and/or equality, diversity and inclusion. Supervising an LPP Work Placement is an Eligible Education Activity (within the Mentoring category). You will complete this CPD Accreditation Application Form when reporting your hours: https://cpdacc.smapply.ca/prog/cpd_accreditation/

As of October 1, 2026, the Ontario Minimum Wage is $718.00/week. If as an employer you cannot pay the Ontario Minimum Wage or the Mandatory Minimum Compensation (MMC) ($620.00/week) as set by the Law Society of Ontario (LSO), you must apply for an exemption to the LSO.

Rates of compensation vary based on an employer’s size and their areas of practice. You set the compensation. Past compensation rates have ranged from minimum wage to as high as $1,900/week.

Recently Published Halton Decisions

5 Oct 2026 11:00 AM | Anonymous

Find below recently published Halton decisions, available for free through CanLII.org.

Superior Court of Justice

Ballance It Inc. v. Lessard (2026 ONSC 5148)
On a motion for an interlocutory injunction, the Court declines to restrain a former employee and his new business from soliciting clients or using confidential information. Although the non-solicitation clause appeared enforceable, the evidence did not establish a strong prima facie case of breach. The Court orders targeted device imaging, deletion, and costs.
Justice J. E. Mills

E.M. v. S.M. (2026 ONSC 5256)
On a motion for a certificate of pending litigation over a home owned by a spouse’s mother, the judge finds a triable proprietary estoppel claim and that the equities narrowly favour preserving the property pending trial. Leave to amend the application is granted, and the certificate is issued, with costs submissions to follow.
Justice C. Conlan

R. v. Khoshaba (2026 ONSC 5429)
On a defence motion for a directed verdict in a judge-alone criminal trial, the Court finds the circumstantial evidence could reasonably support inferences that the accused knew of a firearm in his vehicle and had knowledge and control of a loaded prohibited firearm. The motion is dismissed on both counts.
Justice K. Coats

R. v. Khoshaba (2026 ONSC 5430)
In a criminal trial on firearm charges, the judge applies W.(D.) and finds the accused’s denial of knowledge and control credible. In any event, the circumstantial evidence allows a reasonable inference that the other occupant brought the firearm and related items into the vehicle. The accused is acquitted on both counts.
Justice K. Coats

Khan v. Zahid (2026 ONSC 5435)
In an uncontested family law trial, the judge refused to recognize a Pakistani divorce under s. 22 of the Divorce Act and common law principles, finding denial of natural justice and misrepresentations bearing on jurisdiction. The husband’s Answer was struck, the wife was allowed to proceed with an uncontested Canadian divorce, and costs of $12,500 were ordered.
Justice M. Kurz

Ontario Court of Justice

Halton (Regional Municipality) v. Tsaltas (2026 ONCJ 545)
In an appeal from a POA Part I conviction, the Court holds a trial justice may choose either the s. 9.1 administrative default route or a s. 54 trial in absentia when a defendant requests a trial but does not attend. Any amendment error was immaterial; location omission caused no prejudice. Appeal dismissed.
Justice P. Maund

Court of Appeal Decisions of Local Interest

Nanda v. Oakville (Joint Compliance Audit Committee) (2026 ONCA 638)
In an appeal from a court order setting aside a compliance audit decision, the Court holds that s. 88.33(1) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 allows any elector entitled to vote in the municipal election to apply for a compliance audit, regardless of ward. The appeal is allowed and the audit decision reinstated.
Justice M. Kurz

You're Invited: AFCC Ontario’s 18th AGM & Annual Conference

24 Sep 2026 12:25 PM | Anonymous

Relocation in Family Law: Social Science Evidence and Recent Case Law

AFCC-Ontario is excited to present, Professor Rollie Thompson and Professor Michael Saini at this year’s AGM and Annual Conference, Families on the Move.

Join AFFC-Ontario on October 23rd, 2026 either in person or virtually as the speakers present on complementary legal and social science perspectives on relocation in family law. Professor Rollie Thompson will discuss relocation through the lens of family law legislation and recent case law, highlighting key legal developments and recurring issues that arise when courts are asked to consider a proposed move. Professor Michael Saini will provide a complementary social science perspective, reviewing research on relocation after separation and divorce, including children’s adjustment, parent-child relationships, co-parenting dynamics, conflict, family violence, and the practical implications of relocation for families. Together, the session will help participants consider relocation disputes from both doctrinal and research-informed perspectives, while recognizing the distinct contributions of legal analysis and social science evidence.

The Law Society has accredited the conference with the following CPD credits

Practice Skills: 3 hours substantive
Full Day Conference: 6 hours substantive, 2 hours, professionalism, 45 minutes EDI

Register online at AFCC-O's 18th AGM & Annual Conference - AFCC Ontario.

Thank you.

The AFFC Ontario Chapter
Website: afccontario.ca
Email: info@afccontario.ca

Upcoming Presentation for Lawyers: "Technology in Family Law Litigation" - Sept. 30, 12pm - 1pm

18 Sep 2026 12:52 PM | Anonymous

Progressive Legal Solutions is reaching out to share an upcoming presentation that may be of interest to HCLA members. Currently, they are working to have the presentation accredited for CPD Hours.

“Technology in Family Law Litigation” will be co-presented by Evgeniy Osipov, Principal Lawyer at Progressive Legal Solutions, and Miri Harsonsky, Professional Liaison at OurFamilyWizard.

Please find the event details below:

Abstract: Examining how digital evidence and co-parenting apps such as OurFamilyWizard are used, challenged, and sometimes manipulated in family law proceedings, including emerging caselaw, evidentiary and ethical considerations, and practical lessons from litigation experience. The presentation will also explore how these tools intersect with parenting, therapeutic interventions, and the broader goal of promoting effective co-parenting rather than simply creating a litigation record.

Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2026
Time: 12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Location: Virtual via Microsoft Teams

The presentation is free to attend; however, registration is required. Registration can be completed through the following link:

Progressive Legal Solutions & OurFamilyWizard Presentation – September 30, 12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.

Thank you.

Progressive Legal Solutions
https://plslawyers.ca/
Toronto Office: 416-948-5757
Barrie Office: 705-393-0009

Recently Published Halton Decisions

1 Sep 2026 12:30 PM | Anonymous

Find below recently published Halton decisions, available for free through CanLII.org.

Superior Court of Justice

Zhao v. Goldentrust Development Inc. (2026 ONSC 4652)
The Court struck the Vendor Defendants' defence and counterclaim for failing to comply with prior court orders, including payment of security. The related defendant was not in breach but must amend its pleading. Costs of $5,000 were awarded against the Vendor Defendants.
Associate Justice Glick

Zaidi v. Zia (2026 ONSC 4693)
In a Hague Convention child abduction case, the Court awarded $150,000 in costs to the successful father, citing the mother's unreasonable litigation conduct, refusal to narrow issues, and rejection of a reasonable settlement offer. The Court declined to find bad faith but emphasized proportionality and fairness in the award.
Justice M. Kurz

Bandy v. Newell (2026 ONSC 4702)
The Court dismissed a motion to stay orders reversing parenting time and decision-making authority, citing the mother’s contempt and the child’s best interests in fostering a relationship with the father.
Justice M. Kurz

The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores v. 2706913 Ontario Inc. (2026 ONSC 4927)
In an application for a declaration that a lease dispute was not arbitrable, the judge held that arbitrability turned on contractual interpretation and could not be decided on a superficial record review. Applying s. 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1991 and the competence-competence principle, the application was dismissed and the arbitrator must decide arbitrability first.
Justice M. Kurz

Ontario Court of Justice

R. v. Hanna (2026 ONCJ 501)
The Court dismissed a Charter application alleging unreasonable trial delay, finding defence-caused delays reduced the net delay below the presumptive ceiling.
Justice P. Maund

Court of Appeal Decisions of Local Interest

R. v. Britton (2026 ONCA 585)
The Court upheld an eight-year sentence for two sexual assaults, finding no errors in principle or unfitness in the sentencing judge's decision. The appellant's mitigating factors were considered, but the seriousness of the offences justified the sentence. The appeal was dismissed.
Justice C. Conlan

Fan v. Yang (2026 ONCA 601)
In an appeal from a family law order, the appellate court dismisses arguments of procedural unfairness and failure to decide support and separation-agreement issues. It holds the appellant should have appealed the in‑person trial order rather than disobey it. The trial properly proceeded in her absence and dismissed her claims.
Justice C. Chang

Halton Terry Fox Run | Sunday, September 20, 2026

31 Aug 2026 1:10 PM | Anonymous

On Sunday, September 20, 2026, communities across Canada will once again come together for the annual Terry Fox Run, continuing a proud Canadian tradition and raising funds for vital cancer research.

The Terry Fox Run is a wonderful opportunity for members of the Halton legal community, together with family, friends and colleagues, to get out and support the communities in which we live and work. You can run, walk, bring the kids or simply come out and take part. It isn't a race — although a little friendly competition among lawyers is always welcome!

There are five Terry Fox Runs across Halton Region this year:

Community and Location	Run-Day Details
Oakville: Coronation Park, 1426 Lakeshore Rd W	Registration 9:00 a.m.; Run 10:00 a.m.
Burlington: Spencer Smith Park, 1400 Lakeshore Rd	Runners 9:00 a.m.; Walkers 10:00 a.m.
Milton: E.C. Drury School for the Deaf, 255 Ontario Street South – Front Entrance	Registration 8:30 a.m.; Run 10:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m.
Georgetown: Georgetown Fairgrounds, 1 Park Ave	9:00 a.m.
Acton: Acton High School Track, 21 Cedar Road	8:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m.

Register, donate or learn more about your local Run:

Oakville: https://run.terryfox.ca/129609
Burlington: https://run.terryfox.ca/129611
Milton: https://run.terryfox.ca/129676
Georgetown: https://run.terryfox.ca/129722
Acton: https://run.terryfox.ca/129629

More than four decades after Terry Fox's Marathon of Hope, his determination and vision continue to bring Canadians together and support important advances in cancer research. It would be great to see a strong turnout from the Halton County Law Association at Run sites throughout the Region.

Pick your local Run, lace up your shoes and join your community on September 20. And if a little Oakville–Burlington–Milton–Georgetown–Acton rivalry helps raise a few more dollars for cancer research, all the better.

Hope to see many HCLA members out on Run Day!

Thank you.

Trevor Branion
from the Oakville Terry Fox Committee
trevor@branionwilliams.com

Recently Published Halton Decisions

4 Aug 2026 10:30 AM | Anonymous

Find below recently published Halton decisions, available for free through CanLII.org.

Superior Court of Justice

Mehta v. Shah (2026 ONSC 4313)
In a custody dispute, the Court granted sole decision-making responsibility to the father, citing the mother's contempt of court, unlawful retention of the children in India, and actions undermining the children's relationship with their father. The decision prioritized the children's best interests under the Children's Law Reform Act.
Justice C. Conlan

Berlingieri v. 11776240 Canada Inc. (2026 ONSC 4289)
The Court ruled that commencing a new action instead of amending a stayed counterclaim was not an abuse of process, as it avoided unnecessary procedural steps and did not prejudice the defendants. The plaintiff was not required to seek authorization under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act to proceed.
Justice M. Kurz

Ontario Court of Justice

R. v. Barone (2026 ONCJ 405)
The Court sentenced the accused to an 18-month conditional sentence with strict conditions, emphasizing denunciation and deterrence while considering mitigating factors, including age, health, remorse, and low risk of reoffending.
Russell Browne, counsel

Court of Appeal Decisions of Local Interest

Senos v. Senos (2026 ONCA 552)
In a contentious family law appeal, the Court upheld spousal support but overturned rulings on costs, corporate tax liability, and a peace bond, citing legal errors, lack of procedural fairness, and improper application of corporate law principles. Equalization issues remain unresolved pending further proceedings.
Justice E. Chozik

Recently Published Halton Decisions

15 Jul 2026 4:11 PM | Anonymous

Find below recently published Halton decisions, available for free through CanLII.org.

Superior Court of Justice

Abbasi v. Jabbar (2026 ONSC 3638)
In a family law dispute, the Court dismissed a motion to stay ongoing proceedings, citing the appellant's tactical delays, non-compliance with court orders, and lack of irreparable harm. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial case management and the prejudice to the respondent if the stay were granted.
Justice M. Kurz

CIBC v. Pillai (2026 ONSC 3639)
The Court allowed a default judgment to be split into separate secured and unsecured judgments, enabling compliance with mortgage insurer requirements. This procedural amendment was deemed fair, proportional, and non-prejudicial to the defendants, ensuring the plaintiff could recover the insured mortgage shortfall.
Justice M. Kurz

R v. Mukunzi (2026 ONSC 3854)
The Court sentenced the Accused to time served for firearm possession, fleeing police, and possessing a stolen vehicle, emphasizing deterrence, rehabilitation, and proportionality. Ancillary orders, including a lifetime firearms prohibition and DNA order, were imposed.
Justice C. Conlan

Meinert v. Zambosco (2026 ONSC 3636)
The Court granted leave to register a Certificate of Pending Litigation, finding a triable issue regarding the Plaintiff's asserted interest in the Defendant's condo, based on alleged payments and a constructive trust claim. Equitable factors, including potential harm to the Plaintiff absent a CPL, supported the decision.
Associate Justice Glick

Saldanha v. Campagnaro (2026 ONSC 3733)
In a dispute involving alleged fraud and asset dissipation, the Court lifted a Mareva injunction against individual defendants, citing insufficient evidence of irreparable harm to plaintiffs and greater risk of harm to defendants pending a full hearing. The decision was made without prejudice to the ultimate motion outcome.
Justice M. Kurz

Johnson v. Bobanovic (2026 ONSC 3734)
The Court dismissed motions for a certificate of pending litigation and preservation orders, finding insufficient evidence of entitlement to property or risk of asset depletion. The applicant's claims of sweat equity and financial contributions did not establish a triable issue or justify interim relief.
Justice M. Kurz

A.A. v. Rex (2026 ONSC 3747)
The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no ineffective assistance of counsel. Trial counsel's decisions, including cross-examination strategy and not pursuing certain applications, were deemed reasonable and professional. The appellant failed to demonstrate incompetence or a miscarriage of justice.
Justice M. Kurz

Caretek Integrated Business Solutions Inc v. Bajwa (2026 ONSC 3822)
A lawyer was removed as counsel due to a conflict of interest from prior representation of the opposing party and their likely role as a material witness in the litigation. The court emphasized the need to preserve public confidence in the justice system over the right to counsel of choice.
Justice E. Chozik

R. v. Johnson-Shirley (2026 ONSC 3915)
The Court sentenced the Accused to five years' imprisonment for cocaine trafficking and firearm possession, considering aggravating factors like prior convictions and mitigating factors, including harsh pretrial custody conditions and guilty pleas. The totality principle was applied to ensure a proportionate sentence.
Justice C. Conlan

R. v. Daoud (2026 ONSC 3893)
The Court rejected a dangerous offender designation for the Accused, citing insufficient evidence of intractable risk, and imposed a 10-year long-term supervision order alongside a 10-year custodial sentence for human trafficking, sexual assault with a weapon, and related offences.
Justice K. Coats

R. v. Cooney & Hamber (2026 ONSC 3929)
The Court sentenced two foster parents to life imprisonment for first degree murder and consecutive terms for severe child abuse, emphasizing denunciation, deterrence, and the victims' vulnerability, particularly as Indigenous children. Aggravating factors included abuse of trust, family relationship, and significant harm caused to the victims.
Justice C. Conlan

2628793 Ontario Corporation v. Stolp (2026 ONSC 3881)
The Court ruled that a purchaser of property was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, protected under the Fraudulent Conveyances Act and Land Titles Act, despite allegations of prior fraudulent conveyance by the seller. The purchaser's title was upheld, and a restriction order on the property was ordered removed.
Justice K. Coats

TNT Tactical Training Ltd v. 2807851 Ontario Inc. (2026 ONSC 3950)
The Court found no enforceable contract for a Bitcoin purchase as essential terms, including price and quantity, were never agreed upon. The plaintiff was entitled only to restitution of funds with interest, not specific performance or damages for breach of contract. Claims of fraud and personal liability were dismissed.
Justice E. Chozik

R v. Redmond (2026 ONSC 4046)
The Court sentenced a first-time offender to a conditional sentence of two years less one day, followed by probation, for drug trafficking offences involving methamphetamine and oxycodone. The decision emphasized rehabilitation alongside denunciation and deterrence, considering mitigating factors such as remorse, mental health challenges, and commitment to positive change.
Justice C. Conlan

Court of Appeal Decisions of Local Interest

Bank of Montreal v. Khello (2026 ONCA 441)
Justice M. Kurz

Recently Published Halton Decisions

15 Jun 2026 4:30 PM | Anonymous

Find below recently published Halton decisions, available for free through CanLII.org.

Superior Court of Justice

Vault Capital v. Sarwar (2026 ONSC 2987)
The Court set aside a default judgment due to premature filing and defective service. The defendant demonstrated prompt action, a plausible explanation for default, and an arguable defence, justifying relief under procedural fairness principles.
Associate Justice Glick

R. v. El-Hajj Ahmad (2026 ONSC 3010)
The Court imposed a 4-year, 10-month sentence for drug trafficking and firearm possession, factoring in 18 months of credit for strict bail conditions, including house arrest and GPS monitoring, and 45 days for pre-sentence custody. The joint sentencing submission was accepted as not contrary to public interest.
Justice C. Conlan

Ebube v. Hendricks et al. (2026 ONSC 3108)
In a personal injury case, the Court ordered the production of three years of pre-accident medical records, employment records, and tax returns, finding them relevant and proportional to assessing damages and causation. The Court emphasized the established three-year standard for medical records and the necessity of employment records for fairness.
Associate Justice Glick

Interload Truck Services Ltd. v. General Motors of Canada Co. (2026 ONSC 3140)
The Court ruled that a storage company had a limited possessory lien for unpaid fees under the Repair and Storage Liens Act but failed to meet notice requirements for full lien rights. Claims for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit were dismissed as the owner did not request or benefit from the storage services.
Justice J. E. Mills

Crossdock Systems Inc. v. General Motors of Canada Co. (2026 ONSC 3141)
A storage company claimed a possessory lien over containers stored without the owner's consent. The Court limited the lien to 60 days of storage fees due to the company's failure to provide statutory notice to the owner, as required under the Repair and Storage Liens Act.
Justice J. E. Mills

R. v. Cronk (2026 ONSC 3144)
The Court accepted a joint submission for a conditional sentence of two years less one day for drug trafficking. The decision emphasized the offender's mitigating factors, including health issues, employment, and a significant gap in criminal activity, while balancing denunciation, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
Justice C. Conlan

Dubois v. Abdelatty (2026 ONSC 3228)
The Court set aside a second noting in default, finding the plaintiff improperly used default proceedings despite active litigation and prior consent to set aside a similar default. The defendant was granted 30 days to file a defence, and a case conference was ordered to advance the action.
Associate Justice Glick

Aarooj v. Terra Greenhouse (2026 ONSC 3317)
In a personal injury case, the Court stayed the Plaintiff's action due to non-payment of costs and partial non-compliance with prior orders. The Plaintiff has 60 days to pay outstanding costs or face dismissal of the action. The Court emphasized proportionality and the need to enforce compliance.
Associate Justice Glick

Royal Bank of Canada v. Sajawal (2026 ONSC 3320)
The Court dismissed a motion for interim possession of a vehicle, finding insufficient evidence of unlawful detention and that the balance of convenience favoured the current possessor. The extraordinary remedy was deemed unjustified pending a summary judgment motion.
Associate Justice Glick

Ontario Court of Justice

Halton (Regional Municipality) v. 2792814 Ontario Inc. (2026 ONCJ 338)
The Court dismissed appeals against a guilty plea and $1 million fine for unauthorized tree destruction in a protected area, finding the plea was informed and the sentence complied with statutory limits and sentencing principles.
Justice B. Puddington

Court of Appeal Decisions of Local Interest

Monteith & Sutherland Limited v. Novex Insurance Company (2026 ONCA 384)
The Court upheld the lower court's finding that there was no substantial breach of the duty to cooperate and that the curative provision allowed notice in the next policy period without prejudice to the insurer. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the respondent.
Justice C. Chang